Book free demo

9 Management Styles for Effective Leadership

9 Management Styles for Effective Leadership

Autocratic Leadership

Autocratic leadership is defined by its centralized method of decision-making, where a single leader possesses all authority and responsibility. It is a style that is defined by the fact that one person, the leader, controls all decisions without any input from other group members. This style is also defined by making strong, directive, and sometime unilateral decisions. In the tech industry, autocratic leadership could still be observed today at companies especially in their initial growth stages.

An example in the tech sector would be Steve Jobs at Apple Inc. Jobs was widely known for making the most crucial decisions unilaterally, especially in terms of product design and key features, which were major contributors to Apple’s successes. Furthermore, the style also fostered a disciplined and focused working environment, to some extent even considered rigid, that led to Apple’s market differentiation and achievements in fiercely-competitive markets.

In the manufacturing sector, a good example of autocratic leadership would be the behavior of plant managers. For example, plant managers in Toyota’s productin plants are widely known for their ability to make rapid, unilateral decisions ranging from shutting down a production line due to detected defects. In an environment where precision and control are significant for the output of production, these decisions were valuable in maintaining the standard quality of the production, and these are made possible through autocratic leadership.

In military settings, autocratic leadership is essential in orders from the top that cannot be questioned, creating a system where the information that is received must be acted upon immediately, with strict discipline that benefits execution in high-pressure situations. General Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr. had one of the most autocratic-led operations in modern history with the coalition forces in the Gulf War. He was known for making the right decision quickly, which was important to the operations in wartime, and often came under circumstances where the consequences of failing to make the decision would be catastrophic.

In summary, the evidence provided demonstrates that while autocratic leadership style can provide an efficient way to conduct a particular outcome, it is a style that is undesirable with limited applications. As such, it a style that is suited for highly structured and questionable or even highly questionable outcomes, and these examples included an early growth tech industry or military forces.

Convincing Leadership

Persuading leadership is based on the ability to motivate others to follow them through communication and inclusivity. This type relies in engaging others in an open dialogue and involving them in democratic practices. Thus, it places a strong emphasis on relationship management. Leaders who excel at this style of leadership have a high degree of interpersonal skills, which helps them build trust and teamwork among their followers. At the same time, they are able to engage others and create strong commitment to their vision.

A prominent example of convincing leadership is the transformational change undergone by Microsoft and its leader Satya Nadella. Taking over the firm as a CEO, Nadella redefined the once software-centric firm into a provider of cloud computing and other technology solutions. The new CEO was known to engage greatly with all levels of the firm, while also creating a new mission – to have a “mobile-first, cloud-first” strategy . He significantly improved employee morale, as only two years later, Microsoft stock prices reached their peak .

In the area of non-profits, convincing leadership plays a major role in assuring the successful implementation of campaigns and raising resources. Such leaders, as Wendy Kopp, founder of the social venture Teach For America, use their persuasive powers to manipulate different constituencies, such as volunteers, firm partners, local community, and donors. The latter is especially important for implementation of such an important goal as improving the educational system. Thus, the effective communication of Kopp significantly contributed to the success of her venture. Small businesses, such as pizza parlours or other restaurants, often require the owner to use their powers of persuasion. As cooks are usually under a lot of stress during the peak hours, it is important to motivate the staff and explain the importance of each individual contributor. If leaders manage to convince others to be a part of a cooperative and proactive team, the cooking and service process is likely to be much more effective and smooth.

Paternalistic Leadership

Paternalistic leadership is a variant when a leader acts like a parent of their organization. A paternalistic leader is a master decision-maker who cares about the welfare of the team members and expects the same level of loyalty and respect in return. This leadership style combines autocratic guidance with benevolent concern for their employees’ personal and professional well-being.

One of the most notable examples of paternalistic leadership is Howard Schultz’s management style at Starbucks. Schultz created a “third place,” a coffeehouse that serves as an informal meeting ground between home and work for both employees and customers. Additionally, he was one of the first in the retail sector to provide comprehensive health coverage, including dental and optical benefits, even to part-time employees. Such benefits were a rarity for the retail sector in the late 1980s, but Starbucks employees repaid Schultz for the loyalty the company extended toward them. The result is the presence of “semi-permanent coffee servers” in the company’s stores and growth to become a global powerhouse of a coffee retailer.

In family-owned companies, a paternalistic leadership style might also be prevalent. For example, a small private manufacturing company family-led by a founder who hires specialized employees covers their employees’ full names, life details, and not only business but personal decisions. The decision-makers can even cover the tuition fees of the employees’ children or provide personal loans if needed. The all-encompassing care of the paternalistic leader results in high levels of employee loyalty and commitment. Thus, turnover is generally low, with employees likely to stay with the organization for years. As a result, commitment is transferred into productivity and service quality improvements. All these features characterize Tata Motors leadership under Ratan Tata in the automotive industry. The CEO made it clear that he treated their employees as family members during the 2008 economic downturn when Tata Motors, although facing a dire financial situation, did not lay off any of their employee.

Democratic Leadership

A democratic leadership style is characterized by collective-oriented decision making, where each team member can express their opinion and offer their own option . With the help of this leadership approach, not only is it possible to establish and engage high-qualified employees, but it is also encouraged in the sense that every member feels responsible for the result of the work. The development of the development of new Google products will be considered a classic example of a democratic leadership approach. The company’s management decided that every employee could spend 20% of their working time on any project that interested them. Thus, only through the participation of team members in decision-making was born the Google News and Gmail applications. Furthermore, the company’s management has established a tradition of conducting so-called “brainstorming,” on the basis of which certain ideas are accepted and rejected based on a general agreement .

In the educational sector, the successes of the educational institution can be reflected in the interest of students, as well as in the educational programs, taking into account the interests of each stakeholder. In this context, the example of a democratic leadership approach will be the principal, who regularly organizes meetings with teachers, students, and their parents to discuss the school system’s development and future prospects. The results of decision-making should logically be reflected in the performance improvements, which can be assessed through the student performance metric and teacher satisfaction survey.

For the healthcare sector, democratic leadership experiences can be seen in the case where the hospitals’ head nurses actively involve their subordinates in deciding on a nursing plan and assigning shifts . In this case, it is quite possible to assess the advantages and results of the nursing plan program by patient and employee feedback. According to the study, in the case of decision-making in the collective structure of nurses, the supervision and care of the patient is carried out more carefully, and the medical error rate becomes lower.

Consultative Leadership

Consultative leadership implies that the leader consults team members or the expert before making the final decision. These types of leaders usually wields the final decision-making authority but at the same time engages actively in gathering the opinions or insights of their team or consultants to make well-informed decisions.

One notable case of a consultative leader is software development firm IBM. High tech leaders within the firm use the approach to make their decisions about product features or go-to-market strategies. They typically hold a series of meetings, often complete with technical experts and market analysts to gather input before making the decision. This approach helps ensure the success of a project as not only does it enable leaders to ascertain that the features being planned are technically feasible, but that there is also a market need.

In terms of the environmental policy, leaders can engage in consultative leadership, science bureaucrats, for example, frequently consult environmental scientists or other experts to hammer out a policy. They might also consult industrialists and city council restaurant owners who the new laws will affect. Firm leaders might also consult community leaders before moving. Alternatively, they sometimes send out a draft proposal for public comment; the pollution control agency even arranges public hearings. Often, the regulations are revised as a result.

A great example of a retail firm which uses this approach is Nordstrom, which bases its chain of department stores on high-touch service. Store managers hold meetings with sales staff to get a sense of what customers like or don’t like and uses this information to guide buying and promotional strategies. In this way, the company is often kept well stocked without unnecessarily high inventory levels.

Transformative Leadership

One of the styles of leadership, transformative leadership, stands out for its vision and innovation. The goal of this type of leadership is to alter the role of the entire organization or industry through changes in strategy, culture, or operations Mannix, Wilkes, and Wood 73 . This style is not about just managing the status quo more effectively; it involves transforming it instead.

One of the most prominent examples of this type of leadership is the case of Elon Musk at Tesla, who drove the development of electric vehicles EV . Under his leadership, Tesla became the first company to produce mass-market electric cars. Specifically, Tesla developed autopilot features, produced batteries that could store energy for an entire house for weeks, and introduced other advancements in the field . Besides, Musk is known for his focus on goals: he sets his goals extremely high, and his company accomplishes them. He also creates an environment in his team in which one is either entirely committed to revolutionizing an industry or out. His leadership had a major impact on the company’s operations and the entire industry.

In the sphere of health, the case of Dr. Paul Farmer’s work at Partners In Health PIH represents transformative leadership. His work and that of his organization aimed at the transformation of the healthcare sector in the poorest regions. He insisted on high-quality healthcare in rural parts of foreign countries, opening the clinics that were most often together with the state governments. As a result, the lives of many people were saved by effective treatment of tuberculosis and later HIV/AIDS. His work can be best evaluated by quantitative indicators of his success, reduced mortality rates and increases in treatment success rates.

Finally, in the sphere of education, transformative leadership can be defined using Geoffey Canada’s approach at the Harlem Children’s Zone. This organization is famous for its cradle-to-college support provided for children attending any of the public schools in the Harlem area . These methods have already proven successful in improving the educational outcomes for high school students and children in other urban areas.

Laissez-Faire Leadership

Laissez-faire leadership is characterized by the granting of autonomy to team members, who can manage their tasks and decisions with minimal supervision. This leadership style is particularly effective in environments where employees are highly skilled, motivated, and capable of working independently. Leaders employing this style can trust their teams’ knowledge and capacity to intervene only when necessary. In the tech industry, and more specifically software development companies, this leadership style is often used. For example, Google often allows its engineers and developers to choose their projects and explore new ideas . Its approach to project management and innovation is a good example of this leadership style, as all decisions are not controlled, and each employee can pursue any course of action they find appropriate. This approach has allowed the company to create many novel and original products and features, which might not have appeared in a more controlled environment.

The creative industry also often employs laissez-faire leadership. For example, graphic design or advertising agencies frequently have creative directors who set the vision for their projects but allow the artists or designers participating in them with full freedom to make their parts of the project. These teams’ success can be measured in terms of project quality and client satisfaction, as the participants often have many original ideas they can express during the project’s completion.

In academia, university professors also frequently use laissez-faire leadership. They first guide Ph.D. candidates at the beginning of their research but later they have great freedom in pursuing their hypotheses and research methods. This approach allows students to develop critical thinking skills and experience in independent research, which is so important in academia. The success of this style is reflected in the quality and originality of dissertations and papers written by these students, which later contributes to their academic and professional success.

Visionary Leadership

Visionary leadership is a leadership style centered around a vision and the ability to see and communicate a compelling future to motivate employees and provide innovative strategy. A leader who uses such a style focuses on long-term goals, driving change, and inspiring one’s team to execute daily work while considering it part of their common vision. The best example of such a leadership style is demonstrated by Jeff Bezos, an Amazon founder who has a vision of creating the most customer-centric organization on the planet, which started with books sales and expanded to almost any kind of retail. Thanks to his view of leveraging technology for e-commerce, he changed customer behavior irreversibly, constantly innovating and implementing a specific customer obsession culture. It allowed Amazon to lead in a few industries, such as cloud computing and artificial intelligence, and become one of the most substantial corporations.

Elon Musk’s vision of Tesla and SpaceX’s renewable energy belongs to the most visionary leadership examples. The CEO of these corporations has a vision of preserving humankind and substituting vehicles’ use of fossil fuel with sustainable energy, as well as making human life multi-planetary. This view is reflected in both companies’ important strategic decisions that led to scalable solar energy product creation and commercially viable space exploration. In Tesla’s and SpaceX’s case, the vision of renewable energy’s future led to one of the world’s most salient changes in vehicle manufacture and distribution, providing competitive pressure on other companies and championing information technologies. Both examples illustrate the most visionary leadership, illustrating a definite vision of the future that is reflected in the companies’ goals, products, and development. Visionary leadership is characterized by a leader who inspires, focuses on the long-term future and goals, and promotes long-lasting changes.

Table of Contents

Fast AI Transcription

Transcription conversation to text & and get real-time insights