Book free demo

Why Choose Two-Person Meetings Over Group Meetings?

Why Choose Two-Person Meetings Over Group Meetings?

Ever heard of two person meetings? If you’re worried about the legitimacy of these meetings, you shouldn’t be! By definition, meetings are gatherings where people come together to discuss ideas, make decisions, and share information. While two-person meetings might not be the norm, they have their advantages and play a critical role in certain scenarios.

Two-person meetings, also known as one-on-one meetings, can be incredibly effective for deep dives into subjects, providing feedback, or fostering strong working relationships. In this article, we’ll dive into what a two-person meeting is, its pros and cons, and situations where you might choose it over a larger meeting.

Your AI-powered meeting assistant — Huddles

Smarter agenda , valuable conclusions

What are Two-person Meetings?

Before we dive into the pros of meetings involving two people, let’s first understand what they are and how they differ from private chats between two people. It’s actually quite straightforward. The main difference lies in the term “meeting.” While meetings don’t always need to be formal, they are generally focused on specific goals. Ideally, you should start with a clear agenda and a set time for each topic, knowing exactly what goals need to be met for the meeting to conclude. While one-on-one chats can also be lengthy and in-depth, they do not typically have a clear agenda or specific objectives. That’s the main distinction.

In essence, two-person meetings are structured discussions between two individuals with the intent to achieve specific outcomes, distinguishing them from more casual, agenda-free conversations.

Advantages of Two-person Meetings

First, let’s talk about the advantages of two-person meetings.

Efficient Communication

Two-person meetings can greatly improve how efficiently people communicate, which is very important in today’s fast-moving business world. This efficiency stems from the simplified structure of communication between just two individuals and leads to less miscommunication and quicker decision-making.

Reduced Miscommunication

In larger groups, messages can become diluted or misunderstood as they pass through multiple participants. A study from the University of California found that in groups larger than six, the likelihood of miscommunication rises exponentially. In contrast, two-person dialogues allow for clear expression, since each participant has the opportunity to articulate thoughts without interruption. These small meetings also enable immediate clarification and verification whenever any confusion arises.

Quicker Decision-making

Decisions are made faster in meetings with just two people, simply because you need fewer people to agree. According to research by the Harvard Business Review, smaller meetings, especially those with just two participants, can make decisions up to 70% quicker than in larger groups. This speed is mainly because there are fewer opinions to consider and less need to get everyone to agree, which can slow down decision-making in bigger organized meetings.

As you can see, meetings between two people are really effective for communication, and good communication leads to decisions, which is what most meetings aim for. In fact, focusing on decisions is one of the core principles of efficient meetings, which you can read more about if you’re interested.

Personalized Interactions

Another advantage of two-person meetings is that is enables personalized interaction, as opposed to the more impersonal dynamic often found in group meetings. Meetings involving two people focus more on individual contributions and builds stronger relationships, offering a unique blend of benefits that are less attainable in larger group settings.

Focus on Individual Contributions

A study by the American Psychological Association highlights that when individuals feel their contributions are valued, their engagement and productivity can increase by up to 60%. Two-person meetings not only recognize the unique contributions of each participant, fostering a sense of responsibility and ownership over the meeting’s outcomes, but also ensure that each person’s ideas are heard and considered thoroughly.

Building Stronger Relationships

In the context of building stronger relationships, two-person meetings are incredibly effective. These interactions allow for a deeper understanding of each other’s perspectives, motivations, and working styles. A survey conducted by Forbes found that executives attribute over 80% of their professional success to building strong, one-on-one relationships.

The strength of the relationship forged in these intimate settings often translates into long-term professional collaborations, contributing to a more supportive work environment.


Another significant advantage of meetings involving two people is their flexibility. With fewer people involved, they are easier to schedule and can more easily adapt to different situations or unexpected changes.

Easier Scheduling

Easier scheduling is a significant advantage of two-person meetings, greatly enhancing their flexibility and convenience. In a world where time is a precious commodity, the ability to efficiently schedule meetings is crucial. A recent survey by Doodle, a scheduling platform, revealed that finding a suitable time for a meeting can be up to 80% faster when coordinating with just one other person as opposed to a group. This efficiency is attributed to fewer conflicting schedules and the ease of finding mutual availability.

The impact of efficient scheduling cannot be understated. It not only saves valuable time but also reduces the stress and frustration often associated with organizing larger meetings.

Adaptability to Various Situations

The aspect of adaptability to various situations is another area where two-person meetings excel. These meetings can be easily adjusted to suit different contexts, whether it’s a formal office setting, a casual coffee shop, or a virtual platform. According to a study by Harvard Business Review, smaller meetings are 40% more likely to adapt successfully to unexpected changes or urgent situations compared to larger gatherings.

The versatility of two-person meetings is a huge plus, allowing for greater efficiency and productivity. Whether it’s a sudden change in venue or a shift from in-person to virtual, these meetings can adapt swiftly, ensuring that the conversation and collaboration continue uninterrupted.

When to Choose Two-Person Meetings Over Group Meetings

As we’ve discussed in this article, some of the key differences between two-person meetings and group meetings lie in the efficiency of communication, the level of emphasis on individual contributions, and flexibility. But that doesn’t mean that group meetings are without advantages. They are the norm for a reason, and we can discuss their benefits in a separate article.

The key takeaway of this article is that we should not hesitate to choose two-person meetings when we identify that the advantages they offer are highly-relevant to our goals. Typically, two-person meetings are preferable when:

  1. Quick decisions are needed because communication is more direct and decisions can be made faster.
  2. The focus is on one or two individuals, especially in situations like onboarding a new employee or discussing sensitive topics, and when their input is vital.
  3. Flexibility is a priority, such as when time, location, or budget constraints make large meetings impractical, or when plans frequently need to adapt.

Conversely, group meetings might be more effective when multiple perspectives are necessary or when the goal is to build team consensus.

In summary, understanding the distinct dynamics of these two meeting types and recognizing the appropriate context for each ensures that both are utilized effectively to achieve their respective goals.

Comparative Analysis Table

Aspect Two-Person Meetings Group Meetings
Communication Efficiency High due to direct interaction Lower due to need for structured dialogue
Decision-Making Speed Faster, as fewer opinions are considered Slower, requiring consensus among many
Focus on Individual Needs More personalized attention to each party Less focus on individuals, more on group
Flexibility in Scheduling Easier to coordinate between two people More challenging with larger groups
Adaptability High – can easily adjust to changes Lower – requires more planning and coordination
Depth of Discussion Deeper, more detailed conversations Broader, but potentially less in-depth
Confidentiality Higher, suitable for sensitive topics Lower, harder to maintain privacy
Cost and Resource Efficiency More cost-effective with fewer logistical needs Requires more resources and planning

This table highlights the key differences between two-person and group meetings, providing a comprehensive comparison of their dynamics, efficiency, and suitability in different scenarios.

Huddles One-on-One Agenda Template

Can’t wait to give two-person meetings a try? Try out your first One-on-one meeting now with our tried-and-tested professional One-on-one meeting template developed based on agendas in top companies. Grab it here!


1. What are the primary benefits of two-person meetings?
Two-person meetings offer a more personalized and focused environment for discussions, making them ideal for in-depth conversations and decision-making.

2. How can two-person meetings improve communication?
With fewer participants, two-person meetings facilitate open and direct communication, reducing the chances of miscommunication or misunderstanding.

3. Are two-person meetings more time-efficient than group meetings?
Yes, they typically require less time as there are fewer opinions to consider and decisions are made more swiftly.

4. In what situations are two-person meetings most effective?
Two-person meetings are especially useful for addressing sensitive issues, negotiating deals, providing one-on-one feedback, and discussing confidential matters.

5. Do two-person meetings require fewer resources than group meetings?
Yes, they often involve fewer logistical requirements, such as space, equipment, and scheduling efforts.

6. How can I ensure that a two-person meeting remains productive?
Maintain a clear agenda, stay focused on the topic at hand, and actively engage in discussions to maximize productivity.

Table of Contents

Fast AI Transcription

Transcription conversation to text & and get real-time insights